Background: Although, sexual function is important in married couples’ relationship, little is known about the intersexual relationship especially after delivery. Objective: This is a cross-sectional study which aimed to assess and compare the impact of mode of delivery on sexual function of married couples and explore their sexual relationship after delivery. Patients and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study which enrolled 400 couples during the postpartum period and were equally divided according to the mode of delivery into two groups: group I (200) included women who had a cesarean section and group II (200) had women who had vaginal delivery (VD) and their husbands. Each group was equally subdivided according to the number of deliveries (multiparous=100 and nulliparous=100).Sexual functions of men and women were assessed according to the female sexual function index and international index of erectile function15 questionnaires, respectively. Results: Couples in the cesarean section group showed better sexual functions than in the VD group with a correlation between international index of erectile function and female sexual function index domains. Conclusion: VD, episiotomy, and multipara negatively affect female and male sexual domains.
Abd Elrahman, S., Zeid, A., & Awady, M. (2019). Effect of mode of delivery on couples’ sexual relationship during the postpartum period. Human Andrology, 9(4), 92-98. doi: 10.21608/ha.2020.24779.1056
MLA
sherine H Abd Elrahman; Ayman A. Zeid; MonaEl Awady. "Effect of mode of delivery on couples’ sexual relationship during the postpartum period", Human Andrology, 9, 4, 2019, 92-98. doi: 10.21608/ha.2020.24779.1056
HARVARD
Abd Elrahman, S., Zeid, A., Awady, M. (2019). 'Effect of mode of delivery on couples’ sexual relationship during the postpartum period', Human Andrology, 9(4), pp. 92-98. doi: 10.21608/ha.2020.24779.1056
VANCOUVER
Abd Elrahman, S., Zeid, A., Awady, M. Effect of mode of delivery on couples’ sexual relationship during the postpartum period. Human Andrology, 2019; 9(4): 92-98. doi: 10.21608/ha.2020.24779.1056